- Joined
- Jan 28, 2010
- Messages
- 2,056
Agreed, while the site and your outlook/stance is not in line with mine, following what you have been doing recently has been really informative and your site is definitely looking better for it too tbh. Good luck to you and I will definitely be keeping an eye on how your site progresses over the coming weeks/months/years.Have appreciated your insight into the migrations and how they've gone. It's been interesting to follow.
Apps are not necessary anymore, all browsers support push notifications on desktop and mobile nowadays. It's also one less privacy headache, overzealous permissions are causing data leakage not every site should be fine with.it wont be until every site gets apps and push out the box until forums can have validity on the mobile platform in the future.
Using the facebook app vs using the facebook website on your phone 2 very different experiencesApps are not necessary anymore, all browsers support push notifications on desktop and mobile nowadays. It's also one less privacy headache, overzealous permissions are causing data leakage not every site should be fine with.
Hmm I'm not so sure I agree with this. Apps will definitely help you punch above the others. Agreed there's the data leakage issues, but having an app is pretty much a priority for any site in order for sustainability and longevity. At least in my opinion.Apps are not necessary anymore, all browsers support push notifications on desktop and mobile nowadays. It's also one less privacy headache, overzealous permissions are causing data leakage not every site should be fine with.
The full app does more than just allow you to browse the site and account data.Using the facebook app vs using the facebook website on your phone 2 very different experiences
Native apps are absolutely not necessary to secure that. Users could simply get in their homescreen and app drawer what's essentially a shortcut 'app' to your website loading in the native browser. All gain, no loss, and it doesnt need persistent maintainance, app store fees and can access all permissions the browser has if needed.I'm not so sure I agree with this. Apps will definitely help you punch above the others. Agreed there's the data leakage issues, but having an app is pretty much a priority for any site in order for sustainability and longevity
Arcade is a dead end these days, the market is more fragmented than the Android market by nowI left that software on IB because it had an arcade with like 3000 games in it and other features that xf never had.
Responsive design is perfectly acceptable in terms of "mobile first". It's superior to building native apps in many ways, and what with yesterday's macOS update bringing 100% of modern browsers into the ServiceWorker fold, push notifications for all is coming as well.During the dev period of xf2 i posted many many times the importance to become THE MOBILE PLATFORM FOR FORUMS, because i was behind enemy lines , IPS was accepting me as one of their own.... I kept going across the battlefield and YELLING to xf devs YOU HAVE TO GO MOBILE FIRST! , HEY XF !!! GO MOBILE FIRST!!!! xf2 came out and i just hung my head .....because i knew it was over.
In which universe does IPS have a marketshare lead over XenForo? Because I have been able to find exactly zero statistics pointing to this being the case. IPS is either irrelevant or significantly behind depending on where you look.xf cannot compete with IPS, listen ..... it is not going to happen.
Where are you seeing this decline? If you're looking at the BuiltWith numbers, you will find that IPS is declining approximately three times as fast (IPS decreased by 878 sites this quarter, whereas XF decreased by 250 sites).maybe its the backing money, the coders, the innovation who knows but xf can not stand against IPS as a forum software , if they are developing , clubs and everything else 1st party to try to wow their customers they are 100% wasting their time and the amount of active forums will continue to decrease across the internet as they die.
Admittedly I don't watch boxing, but back in the day when I watched a bit of UFC, "champion" meant "the person in the lead", not "the person at the bottom of the barrel" but maybe the terminology is different in boxing.IPS is the heavy weight champ, xf needed to shift to light weight class where they can take the market .. the belts just hanging on the ropes for them but they continue to get in the ring with someone they stand no chance of beating.
Since IPS has utterly failed to attract 3rd party developers, you think every forum software should stop focusing on 3rd party developers? I'm not sure I understand that logic. Just because IPS failed doesn't mean every other forum software has to failIt is not too late for xf but they need to stop focusing on addons and bullcrap that was popular 10 years ago and go full steam ahead and become the go to choice for light weight mobility forum software built for the future. Until then i'm with the champ.
That's wholly dependant on the niche. Our site for example, is not only a forum. Far from it. I used XF as a foundation base and went from there. We'd benefit 100% from a dedicated app. We did have a web wrapper which worked amazingly well, but the dev teams changed it without prior warning and we moved on. Gutted but that's what happened. But again, it's wholly and certainly niche specific.I have yet to see a convincing argument for why building a dedicated mobile app is better than simply adding the webpage to your phone's home screen. It works perfectly fine for Trakt.tv.
Sure, but in that case, the argument that forum platforms should focus on mobile apps rather than making their sites available for mobile via Responsive is also moot. If your forum is more than just a forum, and that it's next to impossible to build a Responsive version of all of your functionality, then a stock XF / IPS / vB mobile app (or even Tapatalk) would be equally useless.That's wholly dependant on the niche. Our site for example, is not only a forum. Far from it. I used XF as a foundation base and went from there. We'd benefit 100% from a dedicated app. We did have a web wrapped which worked amazingly well, but the dev teams changed it without prior warning and we moved on. Gutted but that's what happened. But again, it's wholly and certainly niche specific.![]()
Agreed, and I certainly do believe that forums' software have to and must focus on making it fully responsive for mobile phone users. 100%.Sure, but in that case, the argument that forum platforms should focus on mobile apps rather than making their sites available for mobile via Responsive is also moot.
Hmm so so.. correct but also not. Take the TAZ app for example; a great idea. Plus these;You would need a 100% bespoke mobile app.
I think coexistence is the main thing; whether an actual app or web wrapper with core notifications and alerts as well as being able to modify it for any additional add-ons etc, then that would most certainly benefit most forum/site owners. In fact I say that with certainty.I think the core argument in the post I was responding to would be that 100% of sites would receive a huge benefit from using a native app vs a WebView saved to your homescreen, which I do believe to be false.
I like some parts of IPS, but the activity stream is an abomination. Xenforo does it so much better.
Wha?
IPS is fully customizable if it sucked its because of you